ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP KECENDERUNGAN FRAUD

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out empirical verification of the influence of factors in attributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, enforcement of regulations, effectiveness of internal control, commitment and organizational ethical culture on fraud tendencies at the Marisa Sub-District Office, Pohuwato District. The analytical method used is multiple regression. The results showed that the majority of civil servants working in the Marisa Sub-District Office, Pohuwato District, perceive distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice to be in the fair category, regulation enforcement is in the very upright category, the effectiveness of internal control is in the very effective category, organizational commitment is in the very category of commitment and organizational ethical culture it is in the ethical category, while perceptions of the tendency of fraud are in the very rare category. The perception of distributive justice does not have a significant influence on the tendency of fraud. Perceptions of procedural justice did not have a significant influence on the tendency of fraud, meaning that the perception of civil servants in the Marisa Sub-District Office of Pohuwato District was related to procedural justice which was felt to not have an impact on the tendency of fraud. Perception of interactional justice has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud, this result means that the higher the perception of civil servants in the Marisa Sub-District Office of Pohuwato District related to interactional justice, the lower the tendency of employees to commit fraud. Perception of regulation enforcement has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud. Perception of the effectiveness of internal control has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud. Perception of organizational commitment has a negative and significant effect on the tendency of fraud. Perceptions of organizational ethical culture have a negative and significant effect on trends in fraud.


Penelitian ini bertujuan adalah untuk mengetahui memberikan verifikasi empiris pengaruh faktor keadilan ditributif, keadilan prosedural, keadilan interaksional, penegakan peraturan, keefektifan pengendalian intern, komitmen dan budaya etis organisasi terhadap kecenderungan fraud pada Kantor Camat Marisa Kabupaten Pohuwato. Metode analisis yang digunakan yaitu regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Sebagian besar pegawai negeri sipil yang bekerja pada  Kantor Camat Marisa Kabupaten Pohuwato mempersepsikan keadilan distributif, keadilan prosedural dan keadilan interaksional berada dalam kategori adil, penegakan peraturan berada dalam kategori sangat tegak, keefektifan pengendalian internal berada dalam kategori sangat efektif, komitmen organisasi berada dalam kategori sangat komitmen dan budaya etis organisasi berada dalam kategori etis, sedangkan persepsi tentang kecenderungan kecurangan berada dalam kategori sangat jarang terjadi. Persepsi keadilan distributif tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecuranganPersepsi penegakan peraturan berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan. Persepsi keefektifan pengendalian internal berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan. Persepsi komitmen organisasi berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan. Persepsi budaya etis organisasi berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan.


 


 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

AICPA. 2002. Auditing Standards Board, Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), SAS No. 99.
Albrecht et.al. 2009. Fraud Examination, Third Edition, South Western, a part of Chengange Learning, USA.
Anik Fatun Najahningrum. 2013. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan (Fraud): Persepsi Pegawai Dinas Provinsi Diy.” Accounting Analysis Journal.
Arens, Alvin A. 2008. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance Pendekatan Terintegrasi Jilid I. Erlangga. Jakarta.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2008, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi, PT. Buana Indah Populer, Jakarta
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith, pp.1-300.
Conlon, D.E., Meyer, C.J., & Nowakowski, J.M. 2005. How Does Organizational Justice Affect Performance, Withdrawal, And Counterproductive Behavior ?, Handbook Of Organizational Justice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Colquitt, J.A. 2001. On The Dimensionality Of Organizational Justice : A Construct Validation Of Measure. Journal Of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 3, pp. 386 400.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D.E., & Gilliland, S.W. 2007. The Management Of Organizational Justice. Academy Of Management Perspectives, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 34 – 38.
Devonish dan Greenidge (2010). The Effect of Organizational Justice on Contextual Performance, Counterproductive Work Behaviors, and Task Performance: Investigating the moderating role of ability-based emotional intelligence. Department of Management Studies, Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Diaz Priantara. 2013. Fraud Auditing and investigation. Mitra wacana media.
Greenberg, R. Baron. 2008. Behavior In Organizations. USA: Prentice Hall.
Huda, Mohammad Choirul.2011.” Peran Peraturan Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Kedisiplinan Siswa di MAN Malang II Batu”. Skripsi. Malang : UIN Malang.
Hofstede G., Neuijen B., Ohayu D. dan Sander G., 1990, Measuring Organizational Cultures : A Qualitative Study Across Twenty Cases, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 : 285 – 316.
Hunt, S. D., V. R. Wood dan L. B. Chonko. 1989. “Corporate Ethical Value and Organizational Commitmen in Marketing”. Journal of Marketing 53 (July), pp. 79 – 90
Ikhsan,Arfan .2010. “Akuntansi Keperilakuan”.Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Jumansyah, Nunik Lestari Dewi, Tan Kwang En. 2001. Akuntansi Forensik dan Prospeknya terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah-Masalah Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional “Problematika Hukum dalam Implementasi Bisnis dan Investasi (Perspektif Multidisipliner).
Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, Volume 1. Oxford University Press
Ones, D.S. 2002. Introduction To The Special Issue On Counterproductive Behaviors At Work. International Journal Of Selection & Assessment, Vol. 10, No. 1/2, pp. 1 – 4.
Robbins S. P., 2001, Perilaku Organisasi : Konsep, Kontroversi, Aplikasi, edisi kedelapan versi Bahasa Indonesia, Jilid 1 & 2, PT Prenhallindo, Jakarta.
Robbins, P. Stephen dan Judge. 2008. “Perilaku Organisasi Edisi 10”. Prentice Hall Pearson Educational International,PT Ideks. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Robbins, P. Stephen dan Mary Coulter. 2002. Management. activebook experience.
Skousen, C. J., K. R. Smith, dan C. J. Wright. 2009. ”Detecting and Predecting Financial Statement Fraud: The Effectiveness of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No. 99.” Corporate Governance and Firm Performance Advances in Financial Economis, Vol. 13.
Theodorus M. Tuanakotta. 2013. Mendeteksi Manipulasi Laporan Keuangan, Jakarta. Salemba Empat.
Wilopo. 2006. ”Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi: Studi pada Perusahaan Publik dan Badan Usaha Milik Negara di Indonesia.”Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9 Padang.
Wilopo. 2008. Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal Birokrasi Pemerintah dan Pelaku Tidak Etis Birokrasi terhadap Kecurangan Akuntansi Di Pemerintah Persepsi Auditor Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. Jurnal Ventura Volume p11 no. 1 April 2008.
Widjaja Tunggal, 2014. Memahami Fraud Audit: Bagaimana Mendeteksi dan mencegah Kecurangan Bisnis. Harvarindo.
Umar Husain, 2002. Metode Riset Bisnis, Penerbit PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta